ArticlePloS one2024
Biological interaction of bioactive polymeric membranes in induced bone defects in rabbit tibias.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate bone repair using three osteoinductive polymers in bone defects created in rabbit tibias. Forty-eight adult rabbits were assessed at various time points: three, seven, fourteen, and thirty days. The groups included a control group (without biomaterial), M1 (Poly L Lactide co Polycaprolactone/Polyethylene Glycol), M2 (Poly L Lactide co Polycaprolactone/Polyethylene Glycol/β-Tricalcium Phosphate), and M3 (Poly L Lactide co Polycaprolactone/Polyethylene Glycol/nano hydroxyapatite). Histomorphometric analysis was conducted to evaluate new bone formation within and around the bone defect. At 14 (p<0.05) and 30 days (p<0.05), the callus area in the membrane groups, particularly in M3, was also significantly larger than in the control group, indicating the osteoinductive potential of these biomaterials. The callus consisted of both bone and cartilaginous matrix, suggesting a robust activation of endochondral ossification. The number of osteoclast was higher in the membrane groups, especially at 14 days in the M3 group, indicating increased bone remodeling activity. The membranes were not fully absorbed by 30 days, creating a space between the defect and the periosteum. In conclusion, all three membranes showed significant chondro and osteoinductive potential, with the membrane containing nano-hydroxyapatite demonstrating the most pronounced potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.