Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39636951›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Biological interaction of bioactive polymeric membranes in induced bone defects in rabbit tibias.

Olicies da Cunha, Cássio Ricardo Auada Ferrigno, Solimar Dutra da Silveira, Bruno Gregnanin Pedron, Danielle Tiemi Komorizono, Flávia Cristina Rosin Prado, Walter Israel Rojas Cabrera, Luciana Corrêa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olicies da CunhaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Palotina-PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7019-1290
Cássio Ricardo Auada FerrignoDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9805-989X
Solimar Dutra da SilveiraGraduate Program in Animal Science, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Palotina-PR, Brazil.
Bruno Gregnanin PedronDepartment of Anesthesiology, Teaching and Research Institute of Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Danielle Tiemi KomorizonoPrivate Sector, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Flávia Cristina Rosin PradoDepartment of Stomatology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Walter Israel Rojas CabreraUniversity of São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Luciana CorrêaDepartment of Stomatology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5774-0750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate bone repair using three osteoinductive polymers in bone defects created in rabbit tibias. Forty-eight adult rabbits were assessed at various time points: three, seven, fourteen, and thirty days. The groups included a control group (without biomaterial), M1 (Poly L Lactide co Polycaprolactone/Polyethylene Glycol), M2 (Poly L Lactide co Polycaprolactone/Polyethylene Glycol/β-Tricalcium Phosphate), and M3 (Poly L Lactide co Polycaprolactone/Polyethylene Glycol/nano hydroxyapatite). Histomorphometric analysis was conducted to evaluate new bone formation within and around the bone defect. At 14 (p<0.05) and 30 days (p<0.05), the callus area in the membrane groups, particularly in M3, was also significantly larger than in the control group, indicating the osteoinductive potential of these biomaterials. The callus consisted of both bone and cartilaginous matrix, suggesting a robust activation of endochondral ossification. The number of osteoclast was higher in the membrane groups, especially at 14 days in the M3 group, indicating increased bone remodeling activity. The membranes were not fully absorbed by 30 days, creating a space between the defect and the periosteum. In conclusion, all three membranes showed significant chondro and osteoinductive potential, with the membrane containing nano-hydroxyapatite demonstrating the most pronounced potential.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsDurapatitePolyestersAnimalsBone RegenerationCalcium PhosphatesMaleMembranes, ArtificialOsteoclastsOsteogenesisPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersRabbitsTibiabeta-tricalcium phosphateBiocompatible MaterialsCalcium PhosphatesDurapatiteMembranes, ArtificialpolycaprolactonePolyestersPolyethylene GlycolsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID39636951
PMCPMC11620654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.