Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39636942›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of single-dose migalastat in non-Fabry disease subjects with ESRD receiving dialysis treatment, and use of modeling to select dose regimens in Fabry disease subjects with ESRD receiving dialysis treatment.

Franklin K Johnson, Shirley Wu, Ginny Schmith, Hadis Williams, Jasmine Rutecki, Atef Halabi, Thorsten Feldkamp, Anthony Sileno

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Progress and Challenges in the Treatment of Fabry Disease.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Franklin K JohnsonAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5426-8171
Shirley WuBiogen, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Ginny SchmithSchmith PK/PD Consulting LLC, Cocoa Beach, Florida, United States of America.
Hadis WilliamsAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Jasmine RuteckiAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Atef HalabiCRS Clinical Research Services Kiel GmbH, Kiel, Germany.
Thorsten FeldkampNephrology Centre Rendsburg-Eckernförde, Rendsburg, Germany.
Anthony SilenoAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal disorder leading to multiorgan dysfunction, including renal impairment and the risk of significant accumulation for renally excreted drugs. Migalastat, an approved therapy in FD patients with amenable variants, is primarily eliminated in urine; however, its use had not been studied in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving dialysis therapy. This study investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK), dialyzability, and tolerability of 123 mg migalastat in non-FD subjects with ESRD on stable hemodialysis/hemodiafiltration (EudraCT 2018-003684-57). Results were analyzed by population PK and physiologically based PK (PBPK) modeling and intended to propose dose regimens resulting in negligible migalastat trough levels in plasma and comparable concentrations above the threshold in target tissues in FD patients with ESRD.

methodsSubjects with ESRD received 123 mg migalastat 24 hours before dialysis and, following an 8-day washout, immediately before dialysis. Matched controls with normal renal function (NRF) received migalastat 123 mg. Migalastat concentrations were measured in plasma, urine, and dialysate, and modeled to select regimens providing similar disposition to NRF.

resultsMigalastat was extracted by hemodialysis/hemodiafiltration (74%/72%). PBPK modeling predicted that 123 mg every other week (QOW) with regular dialysis 2-3 times weekly in ESRD subjects produced: a fraction of time above EC50 similar to FD patients with NRF; adequate Cmax for intracellular trafficking of mutant α-galactosidase A to the lysosome; and Ctrough levels near the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) similar to NRF subjects receiving 123 mg every other day. Migalastat 82 mg weekly produced a greater fraction of time above EC50 and longer duration of concentrations above the LLOQ, potentially resulting in accumulation in tissues.

conclusionMigalastat was well extracted by hemodialysis/hemodiafiltration. Migalastat 123 mg QOW is the proposed dose regimen for further evaluation in FD patients with ESRD, which could inform expansion of treatment options.

trial registrationTrial registration: EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT number 2018-003684-57.

Indexed as

1-DeoxynojirimycinFabry DiseaseKidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisAdultAgedFemaleHemodiafiltrationHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalYoung Adult1-Deoxynojirimycinmigalastat

Identifiers

PMID39636942
PMCPMC11620666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.