Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39636924›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

An exploration of the role of trust and rapport in enhancing vaccine uptake among Anishinaabe in rural northern Ontario.

Chris Sanders, Kristin Burnett, Lana Ray, Marina Ulanova, Donna M Halperin, Scott A Halperin, Canadian Immunization Research Network

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chris SandersDepartment of Sociology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3133-8883
Kristin BurnettDepartment of Indigenous Learning, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Lana RaySchool of Nursing, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3196-3195
Marina UlanovaNOSM University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Donna M HalperinElizabeth & Thomas Rankin School of Nursing, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Scott A HalperinDivision of Infectious Diseases, IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Canadian Immunization Research Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article examines the complicated terrain of immunization acceptance and access among Indigenous peoples in northern Ontario by drawing on conversations held prior to 2019 that explored knowledge about Haemophilus influenzae type a (Hia) infection specifically and attitudes toward vaccines more broadly. In the decade preceding COVID-19, Hia emerged as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Indigenous communities in northern Canada. Before developing new vaccines, it is imperative to hold conversations with the communities most affected and to learn more about Indigenous peoples' perceptions of and knowledge about vaccines, both generally and Hia specifically. We conducted focus groups and one-on-one conversations with Anishinaabe Peoples in northwestern Ontario. Our findings illustrate that decisions to vaccinate are informed by a host of social, institutional, and ideological factors and historical and contemporary relationships with government institutions and health practitioners. In particular, Indigenous community members perceived their relationships with social and health services and education institutions as coercive. Thus, public health approaches cannot continue to operate in ways that prioritize interventions for Indigenous peoples and communities so that they "do the right thing." More emphasis is needed on health service and social service provider knowledge, skills, attitudes and practices-redirecting the onus onto those within the health care system. Solutions must respect Indigenous nationhood and the right of self-determination. Finally, we suggest the term vaccine hesitancy may not entirely capture the breadth of experiences that many Indigenous Peoples and communities have and continue to have within the health care system in Canada.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTrustAdultCOVID-19FemaleFocus GroupsHaemophilus InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPatient Acceptance of Health CareRural PopulationVaccination

Identifiers

PMID39636924
PMCPMC11620442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.