Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39636913›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Classification of glucose-level in deionized water using machine learning models and data pre-processing technique.

Tri Ngo Quang, Tung Nguyen Thanh, Duc Le Anh, Huong Pham Thi Viet, Doanh Sai Cong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tri Ngo QuangInternational School, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Tung Nguyen ThanhInternational School, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-8492-8647
Duc Le AnhInternational School, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Huong Pham Thi VietInternational School, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Doanh Sai CongUniversity of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate monitoring of glucose levels is essential in the field of diabetes detection and prevention to ensure appropriate treatment planning. Conventional blood glucose monitoring methods, although widely used, are intrusive and frequently result in discomfort. This study investigates the use of Raman spectroscopy as a non-invasive method for estimating glucose concentrations. Our proposition entails employing machine learning models to categorize glucose levels by utilizing Raman spectrum data. The collection consists of deionized water samples containing glucose with defined amounts, guaranteeing great purity and little interference. We assess the efficacy of three machine learning models in categorizing glucose levels which including Extra Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine (SVM). In addition, we employ data pre-processing techniques such as fluorescence background removal and hotspot series extraction to improve the performance of the model. The primary results demonstrate that the utilization of these pre-processing techniques greatly enhances the accuracy of classification. Among these techniques, the Extra Trees model achieves the highest accuracy, reaching 95%. This study showcases the viability of employing machine learning techniques to forecast glucose levels based on Raman spectroscopy data. Additionally, it emphasizes the significance of data pre-processing in enhancing the accuracy of the model's results.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSpectrum Analysis, RamanWaterBlood GlucoseGlucoseHumansSupport Vector MachineBlood GlucoseGlucoseWater

Identifiers

PMID39636913
PMCPMC11620423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.