ArticlePLOS global public health2024
A global scoping review of the circumstances of care seeking for abortion later in pregnancy.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complications Following Late Second-Trimester Dilatation and Evacuation: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison of Missed and Induced Abortions.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Medical Termination of Pregnancy: Contrast in American and Indian Positions in the Global Scenario.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the circumstances of abortions later in pregnancy provides insight about the barriers and delays to timely care. Limited synthesized information is available on these circumstances, especially from low and middle incomes countries. Reviewing what is reported in the literature about the circumstances of abortion later in pregnancy and the methodological approaches used to study this is needed to reveal evidence gaps. The purpose of this study is to describe what is documented and methodological approaches used in existing literature on the circumstances and characteristics associated with seeking care for abortion later in pregnancy reported in population and facility-based studies. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed research in OVID/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, SocIndex, and LILACs from 2007-2024 that described the circumstance, sociodemographic characteristics, population- or facility-based proportion of abortion later in pregnancy (≥12 weeks of gestation or "second trimester") reported in the literature. We screened 2598 records by title and/or abstract and 668 of those by full text. We included 78 studies that described the circumstances around seeking care for abortion later in pregnancy from qualitative data (12 studies); included information on associated characteristics from quantitative data (15 studies); reported a population- (17 studies) or facility-based (45 studies) proportion of abortion later in pregnancy. Prominent themes included health system challenges, late pregnancy recognition, financial challenges, and delayed decision making. Low economic status and adolescence were commonly associated characteristics. Population and facility-based studies lacked standardization when reporting durations of gestation. Facility studies reported a wide variety of populations and number of facilities. Circumstances surrounding abortions later in pregnancy include health system challenges, late pregnancy recognition, financial issues, and delayed decision-making, which intersect to compound and extend delays. More research guided by clear methods and standard definitions when reporting on population and facility-based proportions of abortions later in pregnancy is needed to reveal evidence gaps and better inform policies and programs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.