Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39636911›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

A global scoping review of the circumstances of care seeking for abortion later in pregnancy.

Laura E Jacobson, Blair G Darney, Heidi Bart Johnston, Bela Ganatra

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Medical Termination of Pregnancy: Contrast in American and Indian Positions in the Global Scenario.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura E JacobsonUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0996-7408
Blair G DarneyDept Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Heidi Bart JohnstonUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7693-4892
Bela GanatraUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the circumstances of abortions later in pregnancy provides insight about the barriers and delays to timely care. Limited synthesized information is available on these circumstances, especially from low and middle incomes countries. Reviewing what is reported in the literature about the circumstances of abortion later in pregnancy and the methodological approaches used to study this is needed to reveal evidence gaps. The purpose of this study is to describe what is documented and methodological approaches used in existing literature on the circumstances and characteristics associated with seeking care for abortion later in pregnancy reported in population and facility-based studies. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed research in OVID/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, SocIndex, and LILACs from 2007-2024 that described the circumstance, sociodemographic characteristics, population- or facility-based proportion of abortion later in pregnancy (≥12 weeks of gestation or "second trimester") reported in the literature. We screened 2598 records by title and/or abstract and 668 of those by full text. We included 78 studies that described the circumstances around seeking care for abortion later in pregnancy from qualitative data (12 studies); included information on associated characteristics from quantitative data (15 studies); reported a population- (17 studies) or facility-based (45 studies) proportion of abortion later in pregnancy. Prominent themes included health system challenges, late pregnancy recognition, financial challenges, and delayed decision making. Low economic status and adolescence were commonly associated characteristics. Population and facility-based studies lacked standardization when reporting durations of gestation. Facility studies reported a wide variety of populations and number of facilities. Circumstances surrounding abortions later in pregnancy include health system challenges, late pregnancy recognition, financial issues, and delayed decision-making, which intersect to compound and extend delays. More research guided by clear methods and standard definitions when reporting on population and facility-based proportions of abortions later in pregnancy is needed to reveal evidence gaps and better inform policies and programs.

Identifiers

PMID39636911
PMCPMC11620362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.