Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39636903›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Knowledge about handling hazardous materials as factors associated with adherence to healthcare waste management practices among waste handlers at government district hospitals of Madhesh province, Nepal: A quantitative-qualitative methods study.

Jot Narayan Patel, Shambhu Kumar Upadhyay, Ajay Rajbhandari, Rabindra Bhandari, Anil Poudyal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A case study on healthcare waste management in clinical laboratories in Belo Horizonte city, Brazil.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jot Narayan PatelNepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1488-1537
Shambhu Kumar UpadhyayPatan Academy of Health Science, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Ajay RajbhandariPatan Academy of Health Science, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Rabindra BhandariNepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9119-8416
Anil PoudyalHelen Keller International, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2687-2993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare Waste (HCW) is a special waste produced in healthcare institutions, including hospitals. It has a high potential for infection and injuries. The issue of waste disposal is growing as the number of hospitals, clinics, and diagnostic laboratories in Nepal continues to increase. The study aimed to assess the adherence to healthcare waste management (HCWM) practices and knowledge among waste handlers at the government district hospitals of Madhesh Province of Nepal which lies in the southern part of the country. A cross-sectional mixed-method study design was employed to assess the adherence of healthcare waste management practices and knowledge of healthcare waste management guideline among HCW handlers from 10 district-level hospitals in Madhesh Province. We developed a semi-structured questionnaire from Nepal's National HCWM Guideline 2014 and the World Health Organization HCWM Rapid Assessment Tool 2011, to interview 60 HCW handlers for quantitative information. Then 10 key informant interviews were conducted using KII guidelines with related stakeholders of district hospitals of Madhesh Province. A four-point Likert scale was used to assess the practices and knowledge of HCW handlers and health facility-related factors. Descriptive data analysis was presented in tables for frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, and correlation was presented in Graphs. A thematic analysis was performed for qualitative data by using RQDA and discussing the findings before concluding the study. Among the sixty participants, the median age was thirty-five years while thirty percent were less than the median age. Among total participants, the majority of female were 65% and almost all of them (96.67%) were married. The majority (65%) were females and almost all (96.67%) were married. About one-third (36.67%) of participants were illiterate. Most of the participants had experience of 5 to 10 years. The mean adherence of HCWM was 74.88±9.66 SD. Among the participants, half of them had adequate knowledge while the median knowledge of HCWM was 39 and the inter-quartile range was 5 (q3 = 41, q1 = 36). The mean of the HCWM practice was 24.18±5.96. The median of health facilities-related factors was 13 and the interquartile range was 3 (q3 = 15 and q1 = 12). The full adherence to HCWM guideline 2014 was extremely low among healthcare waste handlers. The HCWs had less adequate knowledge of HCWM and they did not practice to manage HCW adequately in district hospitals. However, the hospitals had adequately provided amenities to manage healthcare waste.

Identifiers

PMID39636903
PMCPMC11620432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.