Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39636871›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Modeling cystic fibrosis patient prognosis: Nomograms to predict lung transplantation and survival prior to highly effective modular therapy.

Annalisa V Piccorelli, Jerry A Nick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Annalisa V PiccorelliDivision of Biostatistics, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1127-7219
Jerry A NickDepartment of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe duration of time a person with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) spends on the lung transplant waitlist is dependent on waitlist and post-transplant survival probabilities and can extend up to 2 years. Understanding the characteristics involved with lung transplant and survival prognoses may help guide decision making by the patient, the referring CF Center and the transplant team.

methodsThis study seeks to identify clinical predictors of lung transplant and survival of individuals with CF using 29,847 subjects from 2003-2014 entered in the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR).

resultsPredictors significant (p ≤ 0.05) in the final logistic regression model predicting probability of lung transplant/death were: FEV1 (% predicted), BMI, age of diagnosis, age, number of pulmonary exacerbations, race, sex, CF-related diabetes (CFRD), corticosteroid use, infections with B. cepacia, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, MRSA, pancreatic enzyme use, insurance status, and consecutive ibuprofen use for at least 4 years. The final Cox regression model predicting time to lung transplant identified these predictors as significant FEV1 (% predicted), BMI, age of diagnosis, age, number of pulmonary exacerbations, race, sex, CF-related diabetes (CFRD), corticosteroid use, infections with B. cepacia, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, MRSA, pancreatic enzyme use, and consecutive ibuprofen use for at least 4 years. The concordance indices were 0.89 and 0.92, respectively.

conclusionsThe models are translated into nomograms to simplify investigation of how various characteristics relate to lung transplant and survival prognosis individuals with CF not receiving highly effective CFTR modulator therapy.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisLung TransplantationNomogramsAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRegistriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39636871
PMCPMC11620394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.