ArticlePloS one2024
A machine-learning model for prediction of Acinetobacter baumannii hospital acquired infection.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated withJournal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Phenotype-Guided Nanotherapeutic Strategies for Carbapenem-ResistantPharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Integrating machine learning and artificial intelligence in the management of Acinetobacter infections: a narrative review.Infection · 2026Review
- Hybrid phenotype-guided modeling across algorithm-feature regimes with application to ICU mortality prediction for Acinetobacter baumannii.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Uncloaking the black-box: the need for explainable artificial intelligence in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases applications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Some newer & simpler biostatistical approaches for more credible clinical research.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcinetobacter baumanni infection is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Early recognition of patients at risk for infection allows early proper treatment and is associated with improved outcomes. This study aimed to construct an innovative Machine Learning (ML) based prediction tool for Acinetobacter baumanni infection, among patients in the ICU, and to examine its robustness and predictive power.
methodsFor model development and internal validation, we used The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database (MIMIC) III data from 19,690 consecutive adult patients admitted between 2001 and 2012 at a Boston tertiary center ICU. For external validation, we used a different dataset from Rabin Medical Center (RMC, Israeli tertiary center) ICU, of 1,700 patients admitted between 2017 and 2021. After training on MIMIC cohorts, we adapted the algorithm from MIMIC to RMC and evaluated its discriminating power in terms of Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, Negative Predictive Value and Positive Predictive Value.
resultsThe prediction model achieved AUROC = 0.624 (95% CI 0.604-0.647). The most significant predictors were (i) physiological parameters of cardio-respiratory function, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels and respiratory rate, (ii) metabolic disturbances such as lactate and acidosis (pH) and (iii) past administration of antibiotics.
conclusionsInfection with Acinetobacter baumanni is more likely to occur in patients with respiratory failure and higher lactate levels, as well as patients who have used larger amounts of antibiotics. The accuracy of Acinetobacter prediction may be enhanced by future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.