ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024
Modeling Ligand Binding Site Water Networks with Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation: Impact on Ligand Binding Orientations and Relative Binding Affinities.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Solvation Energetic Costs of Cognate Binding Site Formation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Appropriate treatment of water contributions to protein-ligand interactions is a very challenging problem in the context of adequately determining the number of waters to investigate and undertaking conformational sampling of the ligands, the waters, and the surrounding protein. In the present study, an extension of the Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation-Monte Carlo (SILCS-MC) docking approach is presented that enables the determination of the location of water molecules in the binding pocket and their impact on the predicted ligand binding orientation and affinities. The approach, termed SILCS-WATER, involves MC sampling of the ligand along with explicit water molecules in a binding site followed by selection of a subset of waters within specified energetic and distance cutoffs that contribute to ligand binding and orientation. To allow for convergence of both the water and ligand orientations, SILCS-WATER is based on just the overlap of the ligand and water with the SILCS FragMaps and the interaction energy between the waters and ligand. Results show that the SILCS-WATER methodology can capture important waters and improve ligand binding orientations. For 6 of 10 multiple ligand-protein systems, the method improved relative binding affinity prediction against experimental results, with substantial improvements in five systems, when compared to standard SILCS-MC. Improved reproduction of crystallographic ligand binding orientations is shown to be an indicator of when SILCS-WATER will yield improved binding affinity correlations. The method also identifies waters interacting with ligands that occupy unfavorable locations with respect to the protein whose displacement through the appropriate ligand modifications should improve ligand binding affinity. Results are consistent with the binding affinity being modeled as a ligand-water complex interacting with the protein. The presented approach offers new possibilities in revealing water networks and their contributions to the binding orientation and affinity of a ligand for a protein and is anticipated to be of utility for computer-aided drug design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.