ArticlePloS one2024
Topology aware multitask cascaded U-Net for cerebrovascular segmentation.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A high-resolution dataset of mouse brain vasculature for deep learning-based reconstruction.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- The Robust Vessel Segmentation and Centerline Extraction: One-Stage Deep Learning Approach.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebrovascular segmentation is a crucial preliminary task for many computer-aided diagnosis tools dealing with cerebrovascular pathologies. Over the last years, deep learning based methods have been widely applied to this task. However, classic deep learning approaches struggle to capture the complex geometry and specific topology of cerebrovascular networks, which is of the utmost importance in many applications. To overcome these limitations, the clDice loss, a topological loss that focuses on the vessel centerlines, has been recently proposed. This loss requires computing the skeletons of both the manual annotation and the predicted segmentation in a differentiable way. Currently, differentiable skeletonization algorithms are either inaccurate or computationally demanding. In this article, it is proposed that a U-Net be used to compute the vascular skeleton directly from the segmentation and the magnetic resonance angiography image. This method is naturally differentiable and provides a good trade-off between accuracy and computation time. The resulting cascaded multitask U-Net is trained with the clDice loss to embed topological constraints during the segmentation. In addition to this topological guidance, this cascaded U-Net also benefits from the inductive bias generated by the skeletonization during the multitask training. This model is able to predict the cerebrovascular segmentation with a more accurate topology than current state-of-the-art methods and with a low training time. This method is evaluated on two publicly available time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) images datasets, also the codes of the proposed method and the reimplementation of state-of-the-art methods are made available at: https://github.com/PierreRouge/Cascaded-U-Net-for-vessel-segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.