ArticleAIDS care2025
What makes peers credible? A qualitative analysis to operationalize peer credibility in HIV-prevention and treatment programs for Latino MSM.
Article in AIDS care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Key Storytellers of Health Information Among Spanish-Speaking Latino Sexual Minority Men in the U.S.: Identifying Barriers and Facilitators to HIV Prevention and Care.Health communication · 2026Article
- Markers of Quality Care in PrEP Services: Qualitatively Exploring Dimensions of Support Among Persons Who Engage in High-Risk Alcohol Use.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The potential of peers to be effective in delivering HIV interventions is linked at least in part to the degree to which they are perceived as credible sources of HIV-related information. This study aimed to operationalize qualities that would make a LMSM peer implementer credible. We conducted a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 20 LMSM and focus groups with 11 HIV service implementers. The parent study collected formative data to inform the design of a strategy to enhance the reach of HIV prevention and treatment services to LMSM. The present study examined participant views on qualities necessary for peer implementers to establish credibility among LMSM. We identified five themes regarding peer credibility, including (1) Peers must be trained in HIV prevention and care, (2) Peers should be verified and have a special designation indicating their knowledge and trustworthiness, (3) Peers should convey accurate information and not spread misinformation, (4) Peers should be relatable and interpersonally skilled, and (5) Peers should be engaged with the general LGBTQ + community to generate trust and credibility. Findings can inform the development of acceptable peer strategies for LMSM, peer recruitment, training, and peer supervision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.