Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39636743›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

When abstract becomes concrete, naturalistic encoding of concepts in the brain.

Viktor Nikolaus Kewenig, Gabriella Vigliocco, Jeremy I Skipper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Viktor Nikolaus KewenigExperimental Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5912-0676
Gabriella ViglioccoExperimental Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jeremy I SkipperExperimental Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5503-764X

Funding

European Research Council ECOLANG,743035Leverhulme Trust DS-2017-026Royal Society WRM\R3\170016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language is acquired and processed in complex and dynamic naturalistic contexts, involving the simultaneous processing of connected speech, faces, bodies, objects, etc. How words and their associated concepts are encoded in the brain during real-world processing is still unknown. Here, the representational structure of concrete and abstract concepts was investigated during movie watching to address the extent to which brain responses dynamically change depending on visual context. First, across contexts, concrete and abstract concepts are shown to encode different experience-based information in separable sets of brain regions. However, these differences are reduced when multimodal context is considered. Specifically, the response profile of abstract words becomes more concrete-like when these are processed in visual scenes highly related to their meaning. Conversely, when the visual context is unrelated to a given concrete word, the activation pattern resembles more that of abstract conceptual processing. These results suggest that while concepts generally encode habitual experiences, the underlying neurobiological organisation is not fixed but depends dynamically on available contextual information.

Indexed as

BrainAdultBrain MappingConcept FormationFemaleHumansLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleVisual PerceptionYoung Adultconcept representationcontextembodied cognitionnaturalistic neuroimagingneurosciencenonesemantic memory

Identifiers

PMID39636743
PMCPMC11620750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.