Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39636724›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

Longitudinal Changes of Visual Sensitivity With Geographic Atrophy Progression Assessed by Defect-Mapping Microperimetry.

Abera Saeed, Robyn H Guymer, Xavier Hadoux, Maxime Jannaud, Darvy Dang, Lauren A B Hodgson, Emily K Glover, Erin E Gee, Peter van Wijngaarden, Zhichao Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Visual Function Assessment in Geographic Atrophy: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Geographic atrophy: Understanding the relationship between structure and function.Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abera SaeedCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.
Robyn H GuymerCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.
Xavier HadouxCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.
Maxime JannaudCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.
Darvy DangCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.
Lauren A B HodgsonCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.
Emily K GloverCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.
Erin E GeeCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.
Peter van WijngaardenCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.
Zhichao WuCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the relationship between structural and functional changes over time in the progression of geographic atrophy (GA) as assessed by defect-mapping microperimetry, an approach optimized to characterize the spatial extent of deep visual sensitivity losses. Methods: A total of 57 eyes from 50 participants underwent defect-mapping microperimetry testing of the central 8° radius (with a 10-dB stimuli presented once each at 208 locations) over a median of five visits, scheduled at 3-monthly intervals. GA lesion(s) on fundus autofluorescence in the corresponding region tested on microperimetry at each visit were manually annotated. Results: At a global level, change of GA extent in the central 8° radius explained a large proportion of the variance in the change in the proportion of locations missed (nonresponse) on defect-mapping microperimetry (R2 = 0.52). Locally, test locations that were entirely outside or within GA lesion(s) had a 0.3% (P = 0.305) and 2.3% (P < 0.001) probability of worsening between the two visits, respectively. In contrast, test locations with a 0% to 25%, 25% to 50%, 50% to 75%, or 75% to 100% change in the extent of GA overlapping between visits had a 4.1%, 12.0%, 17.5%, and 37.9% probability of worsening, respectively (all P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study confirms that longitudinal changes in GA extent are associated with functional changes on defect-mapping microperimetry, both on a global and local level. These findings highlight the expected functional relevance of GA progression, and demonstrates the potential effectiveness of this microperimetry testing strategy for capturing visual function decline associated with GA progression.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionGeographic AtrophyVisual AcuityVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID39636724
PMCPMC11622159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.