ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Mimicking Retinoblastoma Treatment With Repeated Topotecan or Melphalan Develops Cross-Resistance to Classic Agents But Not to Repurposed Drugs.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In Vitro Stability and Preclinical Safety Evaluation of High-Dose Intravitreal Topotecan in Rabbits: Impact of Dose and Concentration.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Refractory or recurrent retinoblastoma results from acquired chemoresistance and the management of these eyes often requires surgical removal. Our objective was to develop retinoblastoma models resistant to chemotherapy by exposing cancer cells to repeated chemotherapy mimicking the clinical scenario. These newly resistant cells were used to evaluate potential novel therapies. Methods: Chemoresistant cells were obtained by exposing two primary retinoblastoma cell cultures to three weekly doses of melphalan or topotecan. The sensitivity of these resistant cells to each chemotherapy was evaluated, and cross-resistance to topotecan, melphalan, and carboplatin was assessed. Genomic alterations and differential expression of efflux/influx transporters between chemoresistant and parental cells were analyzed. Subsequently, sensitivity of both resistant and parental cells to the repurposed agents digoxin, methylene blue, and gemcitabine was assessed. Results: Four chemoresistant models were successfully established, showing significantly higher half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for melphalan and topotecan compared to their corresponding parental cells (P < 0.05). Cross-resistance between melphalan and topotecan was demonstrated, with a 3-fold increase in the IC50. Chemoresistant cells also showed reduced sensitivity to carboplatin (P < 0.05) compared to parental cells, whereas sensitivity to the evaluated repurposed agents remained unchanged. Genomic analysis revealed no selective alterations in the resistant cells, although differential expression of influx/efflux transporters was observed across all chemoresistant models. Conclusions: In vitro simulation of patient treatment was useful to establish chemoresistant retinoblastomas and to identify strategies to overcome resistance to topotecan or melphalan through drug repurposed. Our results warrant further investigation to support the clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.