ReviewAdvances in therapy2025
Effects of Current Therapies on Disease Progression in Fabry Disease: A Narrative Review for Better Patient Management in Clinical Practice.
Review in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal assessment of the retinal phenotype in patients with Fabry disease undergoing continuous enzyme replacement and/or chaperone therapy.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Observational
- Autophagy-Lysosomal Dysfunction as a Converging Mechanism of Cardiomyopathy in Lysosomal Storage Disorders: From Pathobiology to Targeted Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Key considerations for measuring α-galactosidase A activity after long-term migalastat therapy-Avoiding in vitro inhibition effects.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary approach to the assessment and management of children with Fabry disease: Insights from the Chinese Children Genetic Kidney Disease Database.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Article
- Fabry Disease: A Focus on the Role of Oxidative Stress.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Increased Risk of Injury in Patients with Fabry Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Newborn Screening in Fabry Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Fabry Disease Beyond Storage: The Role of Inflammation in Disease Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Progress and Challenges in the Treatment of Fabry Disease.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025Review
- Multidisciplinary Care Model as a Center of Excellence for Fabry Disease: A Practical Guide to Diagnosis and Management by Clinical Specialty in South Korea.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fabry disease (FD) is a rare lysosomal storage disorder that is characterized by renal, neurological, and cardiovascular dysfunction. Four treatments are currently available for patients with FD; three enzyme replacement therapies (ERTs; agalsidase alfa, agalsidase beta, and pegunigalsidase alfa) and one pharmacological chaperone (migalastat). This review focuses on the evidence for the benefits of ERTs and migalastat, and provides an overview of their impact on disease manifestations and quality of life (QoL). Agalsidase beta is associated with renal, neurological, and cardiovascular benefits, and may prevent renal disease progression. Agalsidase alfa provides stabilizing effects across all main organ systems, although minor sex-specific differences exist in patients with more advanced baseline disease. The benefits of agalsidase alfa and agalsidase beta are similar but depend on the extent of baseline disease. Some data indicate that agalsidase beta may be preferable over the longer term. Both agalsidase alfa and agalsidase beta are associated with improved gastrointestinal and pain symptoms, as well as improved QoL. Patients with advanced end-organ damage tend not to respond as optimally to ERTs as those who initiate ERTs before irreversible organ fibrosis develops, highlighting the need for early treatment initiation. Migalastat, which is only approved for patients with amenable missense gene variants, generally stabilizes renal parameters and provides cardiovascular benefits. Migalastat also improves diarrhea and pain, and stabilizes QoL (although ERT may be more effective for pain management), but the neurological effects of migalastat have not been studied. Real-world data raise concerns about effective in vivo amenability of some genetic variants. Future studies with direct treatment comparisons in patients with FD are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.