SynthesisAdvances in therapy2025
Influence of Treatment Effect Modifiers in Fabry Disease: A Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fabry Disease: An Updated Perspective and Review of Treatment and Therapies.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Therapeutic landscape of Fabry disease: advances and challenges from classical strategies to emerging therapies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesFabry disease (FD) is a rare metabolic disorder which presents with considerable heterogeneity in disease characteristics. Given the absence of interventional studies comparing all available treatments, it is important for indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) to account for potential treatment effect modifiers (TEMs). This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to identify patient characteristics that may impact clinical outcomes by analyzing real-world evidence (RWE) in FD.
methodsAn SLR was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, with searches performed in the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases (1946-2022; with a recent update in April 2023). Full-text articles reporting clinical outcomes from RWE studies of pharmacological therapies for the treatment of FD were included.
resultsIncluding studies from the recent SLR update, a total of 119 original studies met the PICOS criteria and 25 studies provided insights into TEMS. Potential TEMs in FD were identified: sex, age, timing of treatment initiation (early/delayed), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria, presence of anti-drug-antibodies (ADAs) at baseline, and previous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). In three studies (two including ERT-treated patients and one study of migalastat-treated patients) males showed worse renal outcomes than females. Five studies found that younger patients and those who received initial ERT before the age of 25 years had greater reductions in plasma-lysoGb3, as well as more favorable renal, cardiac, and biochemical outcomes. Seven studies identified associations between LVH and reduced eGFR at baseline, along with an increased risk of cardiovascular, renal, and neurological events. In four studies, lower baseline eGFR and proteinuria were associated with faster annual eGFR decline despite ERT; high baseline proteinuria was a significant predictor of renal disease progression. Baseline ADAs were linked to lower eGFR, increased left ventricular mass, and reduced treatment impact on plasma/urine-lysoGb3. Migalastat was effective in treatment-naïve patients, while those previously treated with ERT experienced deteriorations in mean lysoGb3, eGFR, and left ventricular mass.
conclusionsThis SLR highlighted several patient characteristics that influence treatment effectiveness in FD. It is important to account for these characteristics in ITCs to ensure unbiased outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.