Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39636456›Full record

SynthesisJournal of occupational rehabilitation2025

Effectiveness and Characteristics of Work Participation Interventions for Adults with Musculoskeletal Upper Limb Conditions: A Systematic Review.

Lisa Newington, Daniel Ceh, Fiona Sandford, Vaughan Parsons, Ira Madan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa NewingtonBarts Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, First Floor Abernethy Building, 2 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK. l.newington@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6954-2981
Daniel CehHand Therapy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7260-1977
Fiona SandfordHand Therapy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1778-891X
Vaughan ParsonsLondon Centre for Work and Health, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0523-3770
Ira MadanLondon Centre for Work and Health, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2200-7329

Funding

Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Charitable Trust PRF-22-POD04NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London NIHR203330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo systematically identify and evaluate interventions to improve work participation for adults with upper limb musculoskeletal conditions, and explore contextual factors and mechanisms that suggest how the intervention is effective, for whom, and in what setting.

methodsThe review protocol was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023433216). Eligible studies met the following criteria. Population adults (aged ≥ 18 years), with musculoskeletal upper limb conditions including traumatic and non-traumatic presentations. Intervention strategies aimed at enhancing work participation. Outcomes measures including return to work, increased work duties or hours, and work functioning. Study design randomised and non-randomised experimental studies, mixed methods, qualitative studies, and case series. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and completed quality appraisal. Interventions were described using TIDieR and the data presented as a narrative synthesis.

resultsTwenty-two studies were included. Interventions were categorised into three groups: multimodal or multidisciplinary (n = 13), ergonomic (n = 4), and exercise (n = 5). Eight interventions were primarily delivered in the workplace and 14 in healthcare settings. Four outcome domains were reported: return to work (n = 18), self-reported work function (n = 4), work productivity (n = 5), and work-related costs (n = 2). Only exercise interventions showed consistent statistically significant benefits. Heterogeneity in outcomes prevented formal meta-analysis. Only five studies were rated as high quality.

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to recommend specific work participation interventions for adults with upper limb musculoskeletal systems. No studies explored the impact of Fit Notes or other formal work guidance documentation.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesReturn to WorkUpper ExtremityAdultErgonomicsHumansFit noteRehabilitationReturn to workSystematic reviewUpper limbWork participation

Identifiers

PMID39636456
PMCPMC12575510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.