ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2024
Translational population target binding model for the anti-FcRn fragment antibody efgartigimod.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and safety of efgartigimod in patients with anti-NMDAR or anti-LGI1 encephalitis and itsNeuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Article
- Efgartigimod for Generalized Myasthenia Gravis and Beyond: A Narrative Review of Its Pharmacological Profile, Clinical Utility, and Expanding Applications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Targeting the Neonatal Fc Receptor in Autoimmune Diseases: Pipeline and Progress.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efgartigimod is a human IgG1 antibody Fc-fragment that lowers IgG levels through blockade of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) and is being evaluated for the treatment of patients with severe autoimmune diseases mediated by pathogenic IgG autoantibodies. Engineered for increased FcRn affinity at both acidic and physiological pH, efgartigimod can outcompete endogenous IgG binding, preventing FcRn-mediated recycling of IgGs and resulting in increased lysosomal degradation. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model including FcRn binding was developed based on data from two healthy volunteer studies after single and repeated administration of efgartigimod. This model was able to simultaneously describe the serum efgartigimod and total IgG profiles across dose groups, using drug-induced FcRn receptor occupancy as driver of total IgG suppression. The model was expanded to describe the PKPD of efgartigimod in cynomolgus monkeys, rabbits, rats and mice. Most species differences were explainable by including the species-specific in vitro affinity for FcRn binding at pH 7.4 and by allometric scaling of the physiological parameters. In vitro-in vivo scaling proved crucial for translation success: the drug effect was over/underpredicted in rabbits/mice when ignoring the lower/higher binding affinity of efgartigimod for these species versus human, respectively. Given the successful model prediction of the PK and total IgG dynamics across species, it was concluded that the PKPD of efgartigimod can be characterized by target binding. From the model, it is suggested that the initial fast decrease of measurable unbound efgartigimod following dosing is the result of combined clearance of free drug and high affinity target binding, while the relatively slow terminal PK phase reflects release of bound drug from the receptor. High affinity target binding protects the drug from elimination and results in a sustained PD effect characterized by an increase in the IgG degradation rate constant with increasing target receptor occupancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.