ArticleHeart and vessels2025
One-year clinical outcomes of endovascular revascularization in patients with acute limb ischemia.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urgent revascularization should be performed to patients with acute limb ischemia (ALI) unless the ischemia is irreversible. In patients with severe ALI and multiple morbidities, surgical revascularization is not feasible; however, endovascular revascularization (EVR) may be an option. This study aimed to examine 1-year clinical outcomes of EVR in patients with ALI and determine prognostic factors. We retrospectively examined 90 EVR procedures performed in 81 patients with ALI between January 2018 and February 2024. The primary endpoint was 1-year amputation-free survival (AFS). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of 1-year AFS. Fifty-one procedures were performed for severe ALI (56.7%). Fifty-six patient were ambulatory at the time of procedures (62.2%). The 1-year AFS rate was 59.7%. Multivariable analysis revealed that hypertension (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.47; P = 0.0007), presence of blood flow of both tibial arteries after EVR (aHR 0.19; 95% CI, 0.03-0.93; P = 0.04), and presence of arterial flow below the ankle after EVR (aHR 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.84; P = 0.022) were independently associated with a higher AFS rate. Aortic plaque was independently associated with a lower AFS rate (aHR 3.98; 95% CI, 1.55-9.90; P = 0.048). EVR may be an acceptable treatment of ALI even in non-ambulatory patients and those with severe ALI. Achieving adequate blood flow of both tibial arteries and below the ankle by performing EVR may be important for improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39636413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.