ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Conservative treatment of injuries to the cervical spine : Mobilization or immobilization].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Robotically assisted and navigated pedicle screw placement at the subaxial cervical spine].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Pathophysiology, Clinical Heterogeneity, and Therapeutic Advances in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Comprehensive Review of Molecular Mechanisms, Diagnostic Challenges, and Multidisciplinary Management Strategies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many injuries to the cervical spine can be treated conservatively. Treatment options include early functional, mobilizing and immobilizing procedures. If a structural injury can be ruled out by morphological imaging, early functional mobilization should be performed in combination with adequate analgesia according to the World Health Organization (WHO) step by step scheme to avoid chronification. If a structural injury to the cervical spine is present, a stability test is crucial for the decision on treatment. Stable fractures include, for example, types I, II and V fractures of the atlas according to Gehweiler, types I and III fractures of the dens axis according to Anderson and D'Alonzo and type A fractures of the subaxial cervical spine according to the AO. If the results of the imaging examination are inconclusive, functional imaging should be performed. If the injury is stable, external immobilization can be used for conservative treatment. Semirigid and rigid cervical orthotic devices as well as Minerva corsets and the halo fixator are available for this purpose. The degree of immobilization increases with the invasiveness of the procedure. Immobilization should be carried out under clinical and radiological monitoring until the injury has healed. An increase or persistence of symptoms during conservative treatment indicates treatment failure and should result in follow-up imaging. Immobilizing treatment should also be accompanied by isometric physiotherapeutic exercise and adequate analgesic treatment. In adult patients the external stabilization should be gradually reduced through physiotherapeutic exercise after completion of the immobilization treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39636395What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.