ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Transosseous lacerations in the ankylosed cervical spine].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transosseous lacerations represent a particular type of discoligamentous injury of the cervical spine and occur in ankylosing diseases of the spine, with ankylosing spondylitis and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) being the primary entities. The altered biomechanics of the spine due to the underlying disease pose special challenges in the diagnostics and treatment. Even low-energy trauma can cause severe injuries of the cervical spine, which are often difficult to accurately diagnose due to the difficult assessability of the conventional projection radiography used in the primary diagnostics. In addition to a correct diagnosis a differentiated treatment concept is crucial as treatment courses can be complicated by pre-existing comorbidities, which are present in the majority of cases. Due to a high rate of secondary neurological deficits without adequate stabilization, surgical stabilization is generally recommended. Unlike the treatment of "classical" discoligamentous injuries in the mobile cervical spine, long segment dorsal instrumented spondylodesis is the standard of care for these cases, whereby ventral stabilization is also of value, either as a stand-alone or possibly additive procedure. The intraoperative site, which deviates from that of a normal patient, can present an additional challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39636394What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.