Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39636242›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Perspectives on goal setting: Video-reflexive ethnography with speech-language therapists and clients.

Laurien Brauner, Karin Neijenhuis, Ruth Dalemans, Philip J van der Wees, Ellen Gerrits

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laurien BraunerResearch Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0820-9799
Karin NeijenhuisResearch Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1955-3639
Ruth DalemansDepartment of Health and Welfare, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1073-462X
Philip J van der WeesIQ Health and Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2881-5159
Ellen GerritsResearch Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4403-0792

Funding

ZonMw 80-86900-98-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGoal setting is an essential step in the clinical reasoning process of speech and language therapists (SLTs) who provide care for children, adolescents and adults with communication disorders. In the light of person-centred care, shared or collaborative goal setting between the SLT and client is advised in (inter)national guidelines. SLTs face challenges in implementing (shared) goal setting as theoretical frameworks and practical interventions are scarce and less applicable to use with a wide range of communication vulnerable populations.

aimsA first step in developing theory and practical interventions is to explore first-hand experiences of SLTs and clients about day-to-day goal-setting practice. This study was guided by the following research question: What are the perspectives and needs of SLTs and persons with communication disorders regarding (shared) goal setting in routine SLT services? METHODS & PROCEDURES: The qualitative study was carried out in the setting of routine speech-language therapy services in community practices, primary education and neurological rehabilitation in the Netherlands. Data collection followed the principles of video-reflexive ethnography, using video footage of goal-setting conversations to facilitate semi-structured, reflexive interviews. Data analysis was based on reflexive thematic analysis. A total of 12 interviews were conducted with client-SLT dyads, covering perspectives from children, parents and adults with a range of communication difficulties and their SLTs. OUTCOMES &

resultsData analysis resulted in four themes, of which two contain subthemes. Each theme represents a central organizing concept found in SLT and client interviews. The themes were identified as: (1) goal setting is a complex process; (2) goal talk needs to be communication accessible; (3) communicative participation goals are hard to grasp; and (4) the importance of relationships. Topics such as power imbalance, communication vulnerability, effective communication strategies, and motivation and trust are explored under these themes. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: SLTs are encouraged to view shared goal setting as a process that needs to be explicitly planned and communicated with clients regardless of their age or communication vulnerability. SLTs have expert knowledge and skills when it comes to supporting communication and applying these skills during goal talks might strengthen shared goal setting and foster a therapeutic relationship. There is a need to concretely conceptualize and embed shared goal setting in policy and clinical guidelines. The themes reported have tentative clinical implications for developing such policy, and shared goal-setting interventions for SLT practice, under the condition that SLTs and people with communication disorders are continuously involved. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject SLTs want to set meaningful goals together with their patients but lack theory and resources to effectively shape the goal-setting process. Few studies have directly reported on the perspectives and needs of SLTs and patients regarding goal setting. Patients generally perceive goal setting as a vague activity in which they minimally participate. SLTs want to involve patients in the goal-setting process and describe the potential benefits, but they also want to report barriers on the systemic and professional competence level. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge SLTs and patients perceive shared goal setting as a multifaceted process, rather than a one-off conversation. This process holds potential vulnerabilities for SLTs and patients alike, and the themes in this study propose potentially helpful ingredients to mediate this vulnerability and shape the goal-setting process. What are the potential or clinical implications of this work? To take the first steps towards effective shared goal setting, SLTs should embrace the element of discovery in goal setting and apply their expert knowledge in supporting communication. To develop practical interventions for SLTs, shared goal setting needs to be further conceptualized and embedded in policy and clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

Anthropology, CulturalCommunication DisordersGoalsLanguage TherapySpeech TherapyAdolescentAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative Researchperson‐centred careshared goal settingspeech–language therapyvideo‐reflexive ethnography

Identifiers

PMID39636242
PMCPMC11619741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.