ArticleCancer research communications2025
Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential and its Association with Treatment Outcomes and Adverse Events in Patients with Solid Tumors.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical impact of clonal hematopoiesis on patients with solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Clonal Hematopoiesis in Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Implications.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Current Understanding of CHIP's Immunobiological Footprint with A Focus on Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Review of the Literature.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Evolving roles of liquid biopsy in precision medicine for colorectal cancer: from single-gene analysis to broad genomic profiling.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- What's hidden in plain sight? Impact of clonal hematopoiesis on the risk and progression of nonhematologic cancers.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Clinical decisions in clonal hematopoiesis: a contemporary review for clinicians.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Impact of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential on Treatment Response and Tumor Microenvironment in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2026Article
- Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and cancer immunotherapy: a host-intrinsic immune-inflammatory modifier of treatment efficacy and toxicity.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Clonal hematopoiesis is associated with reduced response to atezolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Clonal Hematopoiesis and Solid Cancers.Cancer science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractClonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is the clonal expansion of hematopoietic stem cells from somatic mutations. It is a common incidental finding in cell-free DNA (cfDNA). We investigated the incidence of CHIP in cfDNA from patients with solid tumors and explored its association with treatment outcomes and adverse events. We reviewed cfDNA results from a local prospective solid tumor cohort (PREDiCT-l) and two randomized trials: Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.26 [durvalumab + tremelimumab (D + T) or best supportive care in metastatic colorectal cancer] and Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA.7 (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel ± D + T in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma). CHIP+ was defined as any mutation in DNMT3A, TET2, or ASXL1 with a variant allele frequency ≥2%. Presumed germline variants (variant allele frequency >40%) were removed. The first line of treatment after cfDNA was reviewed for grade ≥3 and dose-limiting toxicities. The prevalence of CHIP in the 465 included patients was 10% to 30%, and it was more common as age increased (P = 0.003). DNMT3A was the gene most frequently mutated in all cohorts. Patients with CHIP in PA.7 treated with immunotherapy showed an improved progression-free survival versus CHIP− [HR = 0.55 (0.28–1.07); P = 0.079, P-interaction = 0.098 (multivariable)]. However, patients with CHIP treated with chemotherapy in PREDiCT-l showed a trend toward worse progression-free survival [HR = 1.82 (0.98–3.38); P = 0.059]. There was no difference in adverse event rates between CHIP ± groups for those treated with chemotherapy or immunotherapy. CHIP is common in patients with solid tumors. Although not appearing to affect rates of adverse events, CHIP may affect outcomes from immunotherapy or chemotherapy. SIGNIFICANCE: Liquid biopsy is increasingly being used in oncology for tumor molecular characterization. CHIP is a common incidental finding in cfDNA, and its prevalence increases with age. This study builds on growing evidence of common CHIP variants in patients with solid tumors. The results suggest a possible clinical impact of CHIP on treatment outcomes from immunotherapy or chemotherapy. This may have implications for treatment selection for patients with solid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.