Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39636147›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology2025

Diversity in chemotherapy-induced cachexia.

Leah J Novinger, Natalia M Weinzierl, Andrea Bonetto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leah J NovingerDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
Natalia M WeinzierlDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
Andrea BonettoDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3235-1871

Funding

Treating recurrent HNSCC with radiation and dual TGF-Beta/PD-L1.P50CA261605 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI LUCIA, M. SCOTT · 2021 to 2025
$10.1M
Targeting RANKL for the treatment of muscle and bone defects in cachexiaR01AR079379 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Andrea Bonetto · 2021 to 2026
$2.1M
IGFBP1 mediates a liver-bone-muscle axis in colorectal cancer cachexiaR01AR080051 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Andrea Bonetto · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) P50CA261605HHS | NIH | National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) R01AR079379HHS | NIH | National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) R01AR080051NCI NIH HHS P50 CA261605NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR079379NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR080051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that chronic administration of cytotoxic drugs (e.g., chemotherapy) may contribute to the occurrence of skeletal muscle wasting and weakness/fatigue (i.e., cachexia). Doxorubicin, folfiri, and cisplatin are known to promote cachexia by triggering common alterations such as skeletal muscle atrophy, protein breakdown, and mitochondrial dysfunction, whereas each also possesses distinguishing features in terms of the activated molecular pathways. Similarly, commonalities exist between different cancer types including the development of muscle wasting early in treatment that can persist for years. The impact of treatment for gastrointestinal, head and neck, and nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) on the development of cachexia and survival outcomes is well documented. However, a disconnect occurs between preclinical studies on cachexia, which are often performed on younger mice, and clinical studies on cachexia, which are focused on patients over 60 yr old. Yet, several preclinical studies have examined the impact of age on chemotherapy-induced cachexia. Finally, sex differences have been identified in both preclinical and clinical studies focused on the onset of cachexia consequential to chemotherapy administration and raise the question of whether treatments for this condition should be based on sex specificities. In conclusion, although cancer cachexia has been widely studied for its impact on patients affected by various malignancies, the effects of chemotherapy on the development of cachexia are less explored. Here, we examine diversity in chemotherapy-induced cachexia with respect to specific types of chemotherapy regimens and cancer, and differences based on age and sex.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCachexiaNeoplasmsAge FactorsAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalMuscular AtrophySex FactorsAntineoplastic Agentscancer cachexiachemotherapyelderlysexual dimorphismskeletal muscle index

Identifiers

PMID39636147
PMCPMC12123482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.