ArticlemBio2025
A more significant role for insertion sequences in large-scale rearrangements in bacterial genomes.
Article in mBio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-canonical gene amplifications facilitate adaptive evolution in bacteria.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Genome-wide co-occurrence patterns link mobile genetic elements, antimicrobial resistance and defense systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Mobile-CRISPRi as a tool for genetic manipulation in the intracellular pathogenApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- PlasAnn: a curated plasmid-specific database and annotation pipeline for standardized gene and function analysis.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Investigating the Trans Effects of IS<italic>1</italic> Transposases on Intragenomic DNA Movements in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>.Microbial physiology · 2026Article
- Transmission dynamics of ST346 carbapenem-resistantiScience · 2025Article
- Examining the Roles of Genomic Context and Endogenous Regulatory Elements on ISInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Quinolone Resistance and Zoonotic Potential ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insertion sequences (ISs) are mobile pieces of DNA that are widespread in bacterial genomes. IS movements typically involve (i) excision of the IS element, (ii) cutting of target site DNA, and (iii) IS element insertion. This process generates a new copy of the IS element and a short duplication at the target site. It has been noted that, for some extant IS copies, no target site duplications (TSDs) are readily identifiable. TSD absence has been attributed to degeneration of the TSD after the insertion event, recombination between identical ISs, or adjacent deletions. Indeed, the latter two-recombination between ISs and adjacent deletions-are frequent causes for the absence of TSDs, which we demonstrate here in an analysis of genome sequence data from the Lenski long-term evolution experiment. Furthermore, we propose that some IS movements-namely, those that occur in association with large-scale genomic rearrangements-do not generate TSDs, and occur without evidence for recombination between ISs or adjacent deletions. In support of this hypothesis, we provide two direct, empirical observations of such IS transposition events: an IS IMPORTANCE: Insertion sequences are the most common mobile genetic elements found in bacterial genomes, and hence they significantly impact bacterial evolution. We observe insertion sequence movement at the center of large-scale deletions and duplications that occurred during laboratory evolution experiments with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.