Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39636122›Full record

ArticlemBio2025

A more significant role for insertion sequences in large-scale rearrangements in bacterial genomes.

Wing Y Ngan, Lavisha Parab, Frederic Bertels, Jenna Gallie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Quinolone Resistance and Zoonotic Potential ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wing Y NganMicrobial Evolutionary Dynamics Group, Department of Theoretical Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8722-8942
Lavisha ParabMicrobial Molecular Evolution Group, Department of Microbial Population Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7626-3216
Frederic Bertels *Microbial Molecular Evolution Group, Department of Microbial Population Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6222-4139
Jenna Gallie *Microbial Evolutionary Dynamics Group, Department of Theoretical Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2918-0925

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) GA 2895/2-1International Max Planck Research School for Evolutionary BiologyMax-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insertion sequences (ISs) are mobile pieces of DNA that are widespread in bacterial genomes. IS movements typically involve (i) excision of the IS element, (ii) cutting of target site DNA, and (iii) IS element insertion. This process generates a new copy of the IS element and a short duplication at the target site. It has been noted that, for some extant IS copies, no target site duplications (TSDs) are readily identifiable. TSD absence has been attributed to degeneration of the TSD after the insertion event, recombination between identical ISs, or adjacent deletions. Indeed, the latter two-recombination between ISs and adjacent deletions-are frequent causes for the absence of TSDs, which we demonstrate here in an analysis of genome sequence data from the Lenski long-term evolution experiment. Furthermore, we propose that some IS movements-namely, those that occur in association with large-scale genomic rearrangements-do not generate TSDs, and occur without evidence for recombination between ISs or adjacent deletions. In support of this hypothesis, we provide two direct, empirical observations of such IS transposition events: an IS IMPORTANCE: Insertion sequences are the most common mobile genetic elements found in bacterial genomes, and hence they significantly impact bacterial evolution. We observe insertion sequence movement at the center of large-scale deletions and duplications that occurred during laboratory evolution experiments with

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsGene RearrangementGenome, BacterialRecombination, GeneticDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliEvolution, MolecularMutagenesis, InsertionalDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable ElementsDNA repairEscherichia colievolutiongenomic rearrangementinsertion sequencemobile genetic elementsPseudomonas fluorescens

Identifiers

PMID39636122
PMCPMC11708052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.