Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39635934›Full record

ArticleFEBS open bio2025

Using a 'Students as Partners' model to develop an authentic assessment promoting employability skills in undergraduate life science education.

Kelsey Van, Sana Tasawar, Elaina B K Brendel, Camille Law, Anisha Mahajan, Carissa Brownell-Riddell, Natalia Diamond, Kerry Ritchie, Jennifer M Monk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS open bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kelsey VanDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.
Sana TasawarDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.
Elaina B K BrendelDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.
Camille LawDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.
Anisha MahajanDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.
Carissa Brownell-RiddellDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.
Natalia DiamondDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.
Kerry RitchieDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.
Jennifer M MonkDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1220-1005

Funding

Learning Enhancement Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Authentic assessments (AA) include three principles, realism, cognitive challenge, and evaluative judgment, and replicate professional workplace expectations. Developing AA in undergraduate life science education is necessary to promote critical skill development and adequately prepare students for the workplace. Using a 'Students-as-Partners' (SAP) approach, five students, an educational developer and the instructor codeveloped an AA requiring students to utilize scientific literacy (SL) and critical thinking (CT) skills to develop a data extraction table and generate communication outputs for scientific and nonscientific audiences. Subsequently, the SAP-developed AA was completed by students (n = 173) enrolled in a fourth-year life sciences and pathophysiology course who completed an online survey providing feedback about their perceived development of critical skills and the relevance of the assignment to the workplace. The top transferable skills students reported the greatest growth in were SL (41.6%, n = 72), communication (34.7%, n = 60), CT (16.2%, n = 28), and problem-solving (7.5%, n = 13). Student self-assessed and instructor-assessed grades were positively correlated, wherein 60.6% of students assessed their AA grades below the instructor's assessment and 4.7% of students assigned themselves the same grade as the instructor. Students' perceived stress levels were (a) negatively correlated with assignment grades and feelings of enjoyment, hope and pride, and (b) positively correlated with feelings of anger, anxiety, shame, and hopelessness while working on the assignment. This study demonstrates the impact of AA on the student learning experience and the relevance of AA to help prepare students for life science careers.

Indexed as

Biological Science DisciplinesEducational MeasurementStudentsAdultCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung Adultauthentic assessmentcritical thinkingemployability skillsprofessional developmentscientific literacystudents as partners

Identifiers

PMID39635934
PMCPMC11891773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.