Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39635931›Full record

ArticleJournal of personality2025

When Self-Compassion Lacks Ferocity: Anger and Responding to False Accusations.

Benjamin J I Schellenberg, Amy Geddes, Shaelyn Strachan, Daniel Bailis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benjamin J I SchellenbergFaculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Amy GeddesDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Shaelyn StrachanFaculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Daniel BailisDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of ManitobaTerry G. Falconer Memorial Rh Emerging Researcher Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSelf-compassion can help people when they make mistakes, but does it affect how people respond when falsely accused of making a mistake? In this research, we tested the hypothesis that self-compassion is associated with lower levels of anger after a false accusation which, in turn, lowers the likelihood that people will attempt to challenge the accusation.

methodIn Studies 1A (N = 422) and 1B (N = 492), participants imagined that they were playing in an important tennis match and were falsely accused by an official of making an error. In Study 2 (N = 346), participants completed an online survey that, at one point, displayed a message accusing them of plagiarizing one of their responses.

resultsIn all studies, self-compassion assessed prior to the accusation was negatively associated with levels of anger following the accusation. Anger, in turn, was positively associated with intentions to challenge the accusation (Studies 1A and 1B) and with the likelihood that participants brought the false accusation to our attention when given an opportunity to do so (Study 2).

conclusionThis research shows that highly self-compassionate people are not always ferocious and may be susceptible to being taken advantage of when facing false accusations.

Indexed as

AngerDeceptionEmpathySelf ConceptAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultfierce self‐compassioninjusticemistakesplagiarismPROCESS

Identifiers

PMID39635931
PMCPMC12592581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.