ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2024
[Sensitivity and specificity of epidemiological criteria for the case definition of congenital syphilis in a retrospective cohort in BrazilSensibilidad y especificidad de los criterios epidemiológicos para la definición de los casos de sífilis congénita en una cohorte retrospectiva en Brasil].
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the modified criteria for case definition of congenital syphilis implemented in 2017, which excluded treatment of the sexual partner as a necessary condition for adequate maternal treatment. Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved epidemiological monitoring of 503 children born in 2018 and living in Porto Alegre, Brazil: 412, including miscarriages and stillbirths, had been reported as congenital syphilis cases; 91, who had been exposed to syphilis during pregnancy, were no longer considered cases after partner treatment was excluded as a criterion for adequate maternal treatment. The study involved observation of treatment at birth, laboratory follow-up with non-treponemal tests up to age 18 months or treponemal tests after age 18 months, and symptom-based screening for cohort closure. Results: A total of 286 cases and 126 non-cases were identified using the criteria for reportable cases. Among those exposed but who did not meet the criteria for reportable cases, three cases and 88 non-cases were identified Conclusion: The current case definition of congenital syphilis case for reporting purposes proved sensitive, but less specific. We suggest that it be reviewed in light of the possibility of missing true-positive diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.