SynthesisJournal of surgical oncology2025
Efficacy of Oral Rehabilitation Techniques in Patients With Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Oncological Treatment on Quality of Life in Patients with Head and Neck Malignancies: A Systematic Literature Review (2020-2025).Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oral cancer commonly affects various parts of the oral cavity, including the lips, tongue, gums, palate, and inner cheeks. Oral rehabilitation involves multiple approaches aimed at restoring and improving oral function, esthetics, and overall well-being. This study assessed the functional outcomes and quality of life in patients who underwent rehabilitation following an oral cancer diagnosis. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Dimensions, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases. The study included patients diagnosed with oral cancer who had undergone oral rehabilitation. Functional outcomes and quality of life were key selection criteria. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed, and data were systematically extracted and analyzed. A significant relationship was observed between the type of maxillectomy and quality of life, with obturator retention and stability being critical factors. Radiotherapy was found to adversely impact oral function and implant survival rates, with a strong correlation between radiation treatment and reduced implant survival (p < 0.00001). Additionally, dentition and the timing of implant placement were associated with recurrence rates and adverse effects. The findings highlight the crucial role of oral rehabilitation in improving both functional outcomes and quality of life in oral cancer patients. This study underscores the importance of incorporating oral rehabilitation into oral cancer treatment to enhance patient recovery and overall health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.