Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39635863›Full record

SynthesisEpidemiology and infection2024

Global epidemiology of serogroup Y invasive meningococcal disease: a literature review.

Myint Tin Tin Htar, Jamie Findlow, Paul Balmer, David Swerdlow

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Epidemiology and infection, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Myint Tin Tin HtarVaccine Medical Development and Scientific/Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6148-3101
Jamie FindlowVaccine Medical Development and Scientific/Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5153-4043
Paul BalmerVaccine Medical Development and Scientific/Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8188-1791
David SwerdlowVaccine Medical Development and Scientific/Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1653-6646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serogroup epidemiology of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is constantly evolving, varying by time and location. Surveillance reports have indicated a rise in meningococcal serogroup Y (MenY) in some regions in recent years. This systematic literature review explores the evolving epidemiology of MenY IMD globally based on review of recent articles and national surveillance reports published between 1 January 2010 and 25 March 2021. Generally, MenY incidence was low (<0.2/100,000) across all ages in most countries. The reported incidence was more frequent among infants, adolescents, and those aged ≥65 years. More than 10% of all IMD cases were MenY in some locations and time periods. Implementation of vaccination evolved over time as the rise in MenY IMD percentage occurred. Cases decreased in countries with quadrivalent vaccine programs (e.g., United Kingdom, the Netherlands, United States, and Australia), whereas the MenY burden increased and made up a large proportion of cases in areas without vaccine programs. Continuous monitoring of epidemiologic changes of IMD is essential to establish MenY burden and for implementation of prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Global HealthMeningococcal InfectionsNeisseria meningitidis, Serogroup YAdolescentAgedChildChild, PreschoolHumansIncidenceInfantMaleMeningococcal VaccinesYoung AdultMeningococcal Vaccinesbacteriaclinical manifestiationsinfectious diseasemeningococcalserogroupsvaccine

Identifiers

PMID39635863
PMCPMC11648504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.