ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2024
The national budget impact of managed entry agreement strategies match with high-cost drugs to maximise drug cost saving: a study protocol.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Cost Evaluation of Managed Entry Agreement Techniques Using Real-World Data from High-Cost Anticancer Drugs in Thailand.Journal of market access & health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug expenditure is an important part of health expenditure. Managed Entry Agreement (MEA) is a common strategy implemented in many countries, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European countries to control drug expenditures, especially for new and high-cost drugs. This study aims to explore the appropriate MEA technique for reaching the lowest cost of drug procurement under specified uncertainty of the high-cost drug. Methods: The cost of drug procurement varied by the MEA techniques will be investigated in the quantitative analysis based on MEA taxonomies and uncertainty in terms of price, use, and effectiveness. Then, the content analysis will be employed to the qualitative analytical part to summarise the matching of appropriate MEA technique with the characteristics of high-cost drug to lower the cost of drug procurement and increase access to high-cost drugs. Discussion: The rationales for each MEA technique selection are similar across their objectives. MEA can help reduce drug expenditures. Therefore, the budget in health care system could be sustainable and the patient access to high-cost drug could be increased. However, it might not be suitable for some circumstances and should not be implemented to determine drug price or used as regular reimbursement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.