ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2024
Transparency and corruption risk in pharmaceutical procurement practices at public health facilities in Northeast Ethiopia: a multi-facility study.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fraud in pharmaceutical tenders is a severe form of corruption that poses a significant threat to public health, patients, and the community. Due to the substantial financial volume in the pharmaceutical sector, vulnerable points in decision-making for market entry and purchase are at risk. As a result, the objective of this study was to measure the level of transparency and risk of corruption in pharmaceuticals' procurement practices in South Wollo, North-East Ethiopia. Methodology: From October 1 to December 15, 2023, a multi-facility, cross-sectional study was conducted. The participants were pharmaceutical procurement committee (PPC) members. The World Health Organization's (WHO's) standardised interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. The collected data was entered, cleaned, processed, and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27. Both descriptive and inferential statistics (univariate and linear regression analyses) were computed. The relationship between the independent (health facility level) and dependent (level of transparency) variables was determined using beta with a Results: One hundred eighty-seven respondents, from 47 health centres (low, medium, and high volume) and 14 hospitals (primary, secondary, and tertiary), participated. The aggregate result showed that pharmaceutical procurement practice was very vulnerable to corruption, with a transparency level of only 33.0% (3.3 out of 10). The univariate analysis demonstrated a significant disparity in the mean transparency scores between health centres and hospitals. The linear regression also showed that for every one standard deviation increase in the facility level, there was an associated 0.39 increase in the transparency level of pharmaceutical procurement (β = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02-0.04). Conclusion: The pharmaceutical procurement practice at the health facilities was generally found to be very vulnerable to corruption, which slightly increased with a decrease in facility levels and vice versa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.