ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Expanding the boundaries: investigating the integration of contextual information across a spectrum of inter-trial variability.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The influence of active suppression on stimulus-response binding and retrieval.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Repeating Task-Irrelevant Contexts Does Not Bias Task Choice and Performance in Voluntary Task Switching.Journal of cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is well-documented that feature integration across perception and action creates a retrievable episodic representation, known as a stimulus-response episode or an event file. Previous studies have demonstrated that a task-irrelevant stimulus, which functions as contextual information, can be integrated in various ways. In some cases, the context modulated the binding between a stimulus and a response, resulting in a configural binding structure. In other cases, the context was found to be directly bound with the response in a binary fashion. The current study examined the integration of context within a stimulus-response (S-R) episode, with a focus on the role of inter-trial variability. Specifically, the context variability was manipulated across five experimental groups, ranging from the minimum to the maximum level. The minimum-variability group maintained a consistent pattern of two context tones per block, while the maximum-variability group used a uniformly random order of eight different context tones. Intermediate groups progressively employed greater degrees of variability in the presentation of contextual stimuli. Results showed that the integration of context changed as a function of its variability level: The contextual stimuli with minimal to low level of variability did not exhibit a pattern of integration, while those with moderate to high variability were involved in a configural binding with another stimulus and the response. Only when the context exhibited maximal variability did it become directly bound with the response in a binary fashion. The current findings extend previous assumptions about saliency thresholds for stimulus integration into the realm of inter-trial variability and underscore the role of stimulus uncertainty in shaping context integration. Possible underlying mechanisms are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.