Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39635632›Full record

ReviewNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024

Recent Progress in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Techniques.

Kwan Hyeong Jo, Won Jun Kang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kwan Hyeong JoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Won Jun KangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2107-8160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear cardiology, similar to other fields of nuclear medicine, has experience rapid advancements. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), an important component of nuclear cardiology that commenced in the 1970s, plays a crucial role in the non-invasive evaluation and management of coronary artery disease. Over the past decade, MPI has witnessed significant changes and advancements. The introduction of gamma cameras using cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) systems, accompanied by advancements in related software, represents a notable development in this nuclear cardiology. Ongoing research and development effects are actively exploring new radiopharmaceuticals, with a particular focus on their application in positron emission tomography (PET)-MPI. Furthermore, studies have been conducted highlighting the necessity and benefits of hybrid imaging. However, as with other cutting-edge technologies, the practical application of the latest equipment and techniques in nuclear cardiology faces challenges stemming from their high costs of equipment and examinations and limited accessibility, which continue to remain significant barriers in nuclear medicine.

Indexed as

CardiologyHybrid imagingMyocardial perfusion imagingPositron emission tomographySingle-photon emission computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID39635632
PMCPMC11612050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.