ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Enhancing critical care practitioners' knowledge and adherence to ventilator-associated events bundle: a comprehensive analysis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) Prevention Bundle: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Saudi Study to Assess Knowledge, Adherence, and Perceived Barriers Among ICU Practitioners in Hail Region.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Epidemiology and Outcomes of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Saudi Arabian Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of nurses in ICU on preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: a cross-sectional study in Gansu Province, China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Few surveys have focused on ventilator-associated pneumonia occurring in critically ill patients undergoing intubation and mechanical ventilation. Limited knowledge among healthcare workers may impede compliance with evidence-based guidelines for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia. We evaluate the knowledge of intensive care professionals related to preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care units. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Adult critical care departments in four tertiary hospitals in Riyadh in Saudi Arabia. Subjects: Adult intensive care units attending physicians (intensivist, non-intensivist), Nurses, and Respiratory Therapist who works in ICUs. Measurement and main results: We analyzed 758 questionnaires (100% response rate) from four tertiary hospitals in Riyadh provinces. Nurses constitute the largest group, with most of all professions being Saudi nationals at [343(45.3%)]. Physicians are primarily male, accounting for [127(16.8%)], while the Respiratory Therapy field is predominantly female at [91(12%)]. Our analysis involved, chi-square test to explore potential variations in knowledge among participants with diverse demographic variables. The finding of this was significant positive correlation between some elements. It provides valuable insights into the intricate associations between demographic characteristics and healthcare practices related to VAP prevention ( Conclusion: Our research identifies key factors influencing ventilator associated pneumonia prevention in critical care settings and provides actionable recommendations for healthcare institutions to enhance patient safety. While this research has extensively examined physicians, nurses and respiratory therapists, there is a depth of investigations comparing the knowledge and practices of these specialists within tertiary hospitals in Riyadh. Conducting such a study is imperative to address knowledge gaps and promote practices that mitigate the adverse outcomes of ventilator associated pneumonia on healthcare systems. This study underscores the pivotal role of education, professional experience, and demographic factors in shaping medical procedures and practices. Targeted interventions in these areas could potentially enhance adherence to the bundle. The study suggests the importance of targeted education programs, mentorship initiatives, and ongoing research to enhance patient outcomes in critical care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.