Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39635603›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Enhancing critical care practitioners' knowledge and adherence to ventilator-associated events bundle: a comprehensive analysis.

Samiyah Alanazi, Wadi B Alonazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samiyah AlanaziDepartment of Health Administration, College of Business Administration, King Saud University Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Wadi B AlonaziDepartment of Health Administration, College of Business Administration, King Saud University Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Few surveys have focused on ventilator-associated pneumonia occurring in critically ill patients undergoing intubation and mechanical ventilation. Limited knowledge among healthcare workers may impede compliance with evidence-based guidelines for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia. We evaluate the knowledge of intensive care professionals related to preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care units. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Adult critical care departments in four tertiary hospitals in Riyadh in Saudi Arabia. Subjects: Adult intensive care units attending physicians (intensivist, non-intensivist), Nurses, and Respiratory Therapist who works in ICUs. Measurement and main results: We analyzed 758 questionnaires (100% response rate) from four tertiary hospitals in Riyadh provinces. Nurses constitute the largest group, with most of all professions being Saudi nationals at [343(45.3%)]. Physicians are primarily male, accounting for [127(16.8%)], while the Respiratory Therapy field is predominantly female at [91(12%)]. Our analysis involved, chi-square test to explore potential variations in knowledge among participants with diverse demographic variables. The finding of this was significant positive correlation between some elements. It provides valuable insights into the intricate associations between demographic characteristics and healthcare practices related to VAP prevention ( Conclusion: Our research identifies key factors influencing ventilator associated pneumonia prevention in critical care settings and provides actionable recommendations for healthcare institutions to enhance patient safety. While this research has extensively examined physicians, nurses and respiratory therapists, there is a depth of investigations comparing the knowledge and practices of these specialists within tertiary hospitals in Riyadh. Conducting such a study is imperative to address knowledge gaps and promote practices that mitigate the adverse outcomes of ventilator associated pneumonia on healthcare systems. This study underscores the pivotal role of education, professional experience, and demographic factors in shaping medical procedures and practices. Targeted interventions in these areas could potentially enhance adherence to the bundle. The study suggests the importance of targeted education programs, mentorship initiatives, and ongoing research to enhance patient outcomes in critical care settings.

Indexed as

compliance and knowledgecritical care unitscross-sectional surveyhealthcare professionalspreventive measures and practiceventilator-associated events bundle

Identifiers

PMID39635603
PMCPMC11614629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.