Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39635597›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Self-directed teaching: a holistic framework for educator autonomy.

Changiz Mohiyeddini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Changiz MohiyeddiniOakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over recent decades, the complexity of higher education in general, and teaching specifically, has increased significantly, resulting in a myriad of challenges for educators. Traditional approaches to teaching often rely on standardized curricula and top-down instructional methods. Therefore, they are critically scrutinized for their lack of adaptability and limitations in addressing the diverse needs of contemporary educators and learners. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the concept of self-directed teaching (SDT) as a response to the contemporary challenges in education and explore its relevance and potential impact on educators and learners. SDT is proposed as a holistic, theory-based, proactive approach that integrates multiple core aspects of the teaching process into a cohesive framework. It aims to empower educators to embrace their autonomy, control their professional development, and adapt their teaching strategies, much like the concept of self-directed learning (SDL) applies to students. SDT has the potential to promote educator autonomy, provide strategies to address burnout, and offer adaptable approaches to meet diverse educational contexts. It encourages educators to tailor their teaching strategies and engage in continuous professional development, positioning them to respond flexibly to changing educational demands. Furthermore, this article outlines the theoretical foundations of SDT, grounded in theories such as self-directed learning, self-determination theory, and constructivist theory. Key components of SDT including autonomy awareness, teaching needs diagnosis, goal setting, resource identification, and continuous evaluation and reflection are discussed including strategies for successful implementation of SDT.

Indexed as

autonomylifelong learningprofessional developmentreflective practiceself-directed teaching (SDT)

Identifiers

PMID39635597
PMCPMC11614623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.