Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39635557›Full record

ReviewNanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)2022

Deep learning in light-matter interactions.

Daniel Midtvedt, Vasilii Mylnikov, Alexander Stilgoe, Mikael Käll, Halina Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Giovanni Volpe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel MidtvedtDepartment of Physics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Vasilii MylnikovDepartment of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0144-3909
Alexander StilgoeSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Mikael KällDepartment of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Halina Rubinsztein-DunlopSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Giovanni VolpeDepartment of Physics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5057-1846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deep-learning revolution is providing enticing new opportunities to manipulate and harness light at all scales. By building models of light-matter interactions from large experimental or simulated datasets, deep learning has already improved the design of nanophotonic devices and the acquisition and analysis of experimental data, even in situations where the underlying theory is not sufficiently established or too complex to be of practical use. Beyond these early success stories, deep learning also poses several challenges. Most importantly, deep learning works as a black box, making it difficult to understand and interpret its results and reliability, especially when training on incomplete datasets or dealing with data generated by adversarial approaches. Here, after an overview of how deep learning is currently employed in photonics, we discuss the emerging opportunities and challenges, shining light on how deep learning advances photonics.

Indexed as

deep learningneural networksopticsphotonics

Identifiers

PMID39635557
PMCPMC11501725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.