ReviewJACC. Advances2024
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Current Knowledge, Research Gaps, and Innovative Research Initiatives:
Review in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes in Takotsubo syndrome vs. spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardiology journal · 2026Pooled it
- Intravascular imaging in myocardial infarction and ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Recurrent Acute Coronary Syndrome in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- From Challenges to Solutions: Patient Insights Inform Psychological Intervention Design After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Impact of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway on the management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026Article
- Isolated First Septal Perforator Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Causing Acute Myocardial Infarction.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Surgical strategies for anatomically high-risk CABG scenarios.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Drug-Coated Balloons and Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Beyond the Typical Demographic: Multivessel Involvement in a Male Patient.Cureus · 2025Article
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD): Unveiling the Enigma of the Unexpected Coronary Event.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Narrative Review of Epidemiology and Public Health Implications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite marked advancements in the recognition and diagnosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) over the past decade, knowledge of the basic pathophysiologic mechanisms of disease, contributing factors, and treatment continue to be poorly understood. We describe significant research gaps in our knowledge of SCAD and introduce strategies including the role of patient advocacy, independent registries, and creation of diverse centers of excellence to bridge the gap in clinical care, research, and outcomes. Lastly, we introduce an innovative patient-centered clinical care and research framework established through the SCAD Alliance and International Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection registry as a model for advancing knowledge of SCAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.