ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Machine learning models can predict cancer-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation in critically ill colorectal cancer patients.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Reveals the Association Between Gene Expression and Immune Infiltration in Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Study From Single-Cell to Survival Analysis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of disseminated intravascular coagulation in critically ill children.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Disseminated intravascular coagulation: cause, molecular mechanism, diagnosis, and therapy.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to its complex pathogenesis, the assessment of cancer-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is challenging. We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict overt DIC in critically ill colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using clinical features and laboratory indicators. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled consecutive CRC patients admitted to the intensive care unit from January 2018 to December 2023. Four ML algorithms were used to construct predictive models using 5-fold cross-validation. The models' performance in predicting overt DIC and 30-day mortality was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) and Cox regression analysis. The performance of three established scoring systems, ISTH DIC-2001, ISTH DIC-2018, and JAAM DIC, was also assessed for survival prediction and served as benchmarks for model comparison. Results: A total of 2,766 patients were enrolled, with 699 (25.3%) diagnosed with overt DIC according to ISTH DIC-2001, 1,023 (36.9%) according to ISTH DIC-2018, and 662 (23.9%) according to JAAM DIC. The extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model outperformed others in DIC prediction (ROC-AUC: 0.848; 95% CI: 0.818-0.878; Conclusion: The results indicate that ML models, particularly the XGB model, can serve as effective tools for predicting overt DIC in critically ill CRC patients. This offers a promising approach to improving clinical decision-making in this high-risk group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.