ReviewAnnals of nuclear cardiology2024
True Opinions of Nuclear Cardiology Practitioners on Semiconductor SPECT Systems: A Multi-Center Survey-Based Review.
Review in Annals of nuclear cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nuclear cardiac imaging has advanced significantly with the development of semiconductor single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) systems using cadmium zinc telluride detectors. These systems provide superior sensitivity and resolution compared to conventional anger-type SPECT systems, improving image quality and diagnostic accuracy. This study, conducted through a multi-center survey among nuclear cardiology practitioners, assessed changes in clinical practice following the implementation of semiconductor SPECT. Results showed shorter scan times, increased examination throughput, and reduced artifacts. However, challenges associated with semiconductor SPECT systems were also identified, including system-specific artifacts and cases that are difficult to image using these systems. These findings highlighted both the advantages and limitations of semiconductor SPECT in real-world clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.