Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39635295›Full record

ArticleSocial and health sciences2024

Community Perceptions and Experiences of the South African Government's Response to the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Michael Galvin, Andrew W Kim, Edna Bosire, Nokubonga Ndaba, Lindile Cele, Someleze Swana, Zwannda Kwinda, Alexander Tsai, Aneesa Moolla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social and health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A survey of perceptions and behavioural responses towards the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael GalvinHealth Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2123-5020
Andrew W KimDepartment of Anthropology, University of California-Berkeley, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0148-7565
Edna BosireCenter for Innovation in Global Health, Georgetown University, United States.ORCID 000-0002-4781-7101
Nokubonga NdabaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
Lindile CeleDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0300-3656
Someleze SwanaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.ORCID 0009-0002-5037-4863
Zwannda KwindaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2150-8327
Alexander TsaiHarvard Medical School, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6397-7917
Aneesa MoollaHealth Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1233-680X

Funding

Partnership for Global Health Research Training Program (Renewal)-Supplement for OBSSR, NCI, NCI-AIDS and NIDCDD43TW010543 · FIC · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Wafaie W Fawzi, DAVIDSON HOWES HAMER · 2017 to 2026
$12.1M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments in low- and middle-income countries largely followed the strategy of national lockdowns adopted by high-income countries. The South African government imposed some the most restrictive policies in the world. In this article, we examine the perceptions and lived experiences of South Africans in Johannesburg in relation to this initial response to the pandemic. In-depth interviews were conducted with a diverse group of 38 South African adults in Johannesburg, South Africa. The analysis followed an inductive approach. The data revealed that the majority of participants had a positive view of the strong response to the first wave of the pandemic by the South African government, including the restrictive lockdown measures. However, concerns regarding the government's response included worries about the economy and livelihoods of poor people under lockdown, divisions in compliance between townships and wealthier communities, poor funding in the healthcare sector, corruption and nepotism in the distribution of government aid, and the lack of cultural adaptation of awareness-raising campaigns about COVID-19. The ability of governments to gauge how populations perceive the effectiveness of public health measures is essential for identifying obstacles to disease-control objectives.

Indexed as

coronavirusCOVID-19government pandemic responselockdownSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID39635295
PMCPMC11617012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.