Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39635228›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2024

A review of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage and gastroenterostomy: assisted approaches and comparison with alternative techniques.

Rongmin Xu, Kai Zhang, Jintao Guo, Siyu Sun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rongmin XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9457-0807
Kai ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Jintao GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Siyu SunDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Shenyang, Liaoning Province 110004, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last 40 years, the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has evolved from being diagnostic to therapeutic. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) and EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) are emerging techniques in recent years; however, there are limited studies and inconsistent results regarding these techniques. In addition, EUS has become a more common alternative to traditional interventions due to its super minimally invasive nature, but the mobility of both the gallbladder and intestine makes it challenging to introduce stents. An increasing number of researchers are dedicating themselves to solving this problem, leading to the development of various assisted technologies. Consequently, this review focused on the comparison of EUS-GBD and EUS-GE with other alternative approaches and explored the various assisted techniques employed for EUS-GBD and EUS-GE.

Indexed as

endoscopic enteral stentingEUS-GBDEUS-GElaparoscopic cholecystectomyperoral cholecystoscopyPT-GBD

Identifiers

PMID39635228
PMCPMC11615986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.