ArticleCureus2024
Correlation of Edema/Tumor Index With Histopathological Outcomes According to the WHO Classification of Cranial Tumors.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetastatic brain tumors are a prevalent challenge in neurosurgery, with vasogenic edema being a significant consequence of these lesions. Despite the critical role of peritumoral edema in prognosis and patient outcomes, few studies have quantified its diagnostic and prognostic implications. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between the edema/tumor index (ETI) and histopathological outcomes according to the 2021 WHO classification of cranial tumors. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)-format magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from May 2023 to May 2024, applying manual 3D volumetric segmentation using Image Tool Kit-SNAP (ITK-SNAP, version 3.8.0, University of Pennsylvania) software. The ETI was calculated by dividing the volume of peritumoral edema by the tumor volume. The study included 60 patients, and statistical analyses were performed to assess the correlation between ETI and tumor histopathology, including Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for cutoff points.
resultsA total of 60 patients were included in the study, with 27 males (45%) and 33 females (55%). The average tumor volume measured by 3D segmentation was 46.9 cubic centimeters (cc) (standard deviation [SD] ± 25.6), and the average peritumoral edema volume was 79 cc (SD ± 37.5) for malignant tumors. The ETI was calculated for each case. Malignant tumors (WHO grades 3 and 4) had a mean ETI of 1.6 (SD ± 1.2), while non-malignant tumors (WHO grades 1 and 2) had a mean ETI of 1.2 (SD ± 1.1), but this difference was not statistically significant (
conclusionsThis study found no significant correlation between the ETI and the histopathological grade of brain tumors according to the 2021 WHO classification. While malignant tumors were associated with larger volumes of both tumor and peritumoral edema, the ETI did not prove to be a reliable predictor of tumor malignancy. Therefore, the ETI should not be used as a standalone metric for determining tumor aggressiveness or guiding clinical decision-making. Further studies with larger cohorts are required to better understand the potential prognostic value of the ETI in brain tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.