Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39634975›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Recurrent Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Diagnosis of Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome.

Muhammad Ansar, Maham Shahbaz, Abdul Nabi Saleemi, Bruce Fox

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad AnsarInternal Medicine, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, GBR.
Maham ShahbazInternal Medicine, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, GBR.
Abdul Nabi SaleemiInternal Medicine, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, GBR.
Bruce FoxRadiology, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a case of a young lady who was admitted multiple times with complaints of inability to digest food and abdominal pain. She had nausea and vomiting for long periods and was unable to tolerate orally. As she was unable to tolerate oral feeding and losing weight, she was started on nasogastric feed (NG feed) and later percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube feeding because NG feed was uncomfortable for the patient and did not alleviate the problem. Clinicians decided to look for alternative causes and an esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed but no cause was found. Later, fluoroscopy findings favored superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Thus, the feeding tube was changed to percutaneous endoscopic gastrointestinal-jejunal (PEG-J) tube feeding which helped her with her symptoms, and the patient improved clinically after some time and gained weight as well. This case highlights the significance of early suspicion and diagnosis of superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Timely recognition may lead to early diagnosis and management, saving patients from debilitating adverse events.

Indexed as

anatomical variabilitymedical weight lossnausea and vomitingparenteralsuperior mesenteric artery syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39634975
PMCPMC11616787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.