ArticleEuropean journal of remote sensing2024
Comparison of contemporaneous Sentinel-2 and EnMAP data for vegetation index-based estimation of leaf area index and canopy closure of a boreal forest.
Article in European journal of remote sensing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data from the new hyperspectral satellite missions such as EnMAP are anticipated to refine leaf area index (LAI) or canopy closure (CC) monitoring in conifer-dominated forest areas. We compared contemporaneous multispectral and hyperspectral satellite images from Sentinel-2 MSI (S2) and EnMAP and assessed whether hyperspectral images offer added value in estimating LAI, effective LAI (LAIeff), and CC in a European boreal forest area. The estimations were performed using univariate and multivariate generalized additive models. The models utilized field measurements of LAI and CC from 38 forest plots and an extensive set of vegetation indices (VIs) derived from the satellite data. The best univariate models for each of the three response variables had small differences between the two sensors, but in general, EnMAP had more well-performing VIs which was reflected in the better multivariate model performances. The best performing multivariate models with the EnMAP data had ~1-6% lower relative RMSEs than S2. Wavelengths near the green, red-edge, and shortwave infrared regions were frequently utilized in estimating LAI, LAIeff, and CC with EnMAP data. Because EnMAP could estimate LAI better, the results suggest that EnMAP may be more useful than multispectral satellite sensors, such as S2, in monitoring biophysical variables of coniferous-dominated forests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.