ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2024
Assessment of End User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) of Electronic Hospital Management Information System (eHMIS) in Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar Pakistan.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine user satisfaction of clinical faculty using Electronic Hospital Management Information System (eHMIS) in Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar Pakistan. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Orthopaedic Division Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar Pakistan from 15 Results: We received 142 filled questionnaires. The mean age of our study participants was 43±2.1 years. Male participants were 128(90.14%) and female 14(9.85%). The eHMIS provided precise information to 112(78.87%) consultants most of the time. Majority (91.54%, n=130) of the respondents agreed that the information content met their need most of the time. Many (57.04%, n=81) consultants admitted that the output was presented in useful format most of the time and the information of was clear most of the time to 117(82.39%) consultants. Majority (69.71%, n=99) of the respondents got the information they needed in time almost always. The eHMIS provided up-to-date information almost always to 111(78.16%) respondents. Conclusion: Majority of our consultants were satisfied with the Electronic Hospital Management Information System (eHMIS) most of the time to almost always and most were using it several times daily.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.