ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2024
Burden of congenital and hereditary anomalies in the population of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Congenital anomalies prevalent in rural population of Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan: Ethnic inequalities and biodemographic attributes.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study was aimed to elucidate the prevalence-pattern of congenital and hereditary anomalies (CA) in the population of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK), which is a logistically difficult area in the north-east of Pakistan and in the foot-hills of Himalayas. Method: A cross-sectional clinico-epidemiological study was carried out during 2018-2020 in three districts of AJK and individuals/families with CA were recruited from hospitals, public places and through door-to-door surveys. The anomalies were classified with the help of specialized clinicians and their definitions were sought from OMIM and ICD-10 databases. Descriptive statistics was employed. Results: A total of 1193 independent individuals/families with certain type of CA were included. The CA were categorized into 10 major and 85 minor entities. Among the major categories, neurological disorders had the highest representation (n=403; proportion: 0.338; 95%-CI: 0.311-0.365), followed by limb defects (n=362; prop.: 0.303; 95%-CI: 0.277-0.330), sensorineural defects (n=187; prop.: 0.157; 95%-CI: 0.136-0.177), musculoskeletal disorders (n=64), visual impairments (n=64), ectodermal disorders (n=40), orofacial disorder (n=34), blood disorder (n=11), metabolic disorders (n=8), and others (n=20). The anomalies with sporadic presentations were twice as common as familial cases, and there was remarkably high preponderance of isolated cases compared to syndromic presentations (82% vs. 18%, respectively). The parental consanguinity was observed in 63% cases and was statistically significantly higher in familial cases compared to sporadic. Conclusions: Majority of the anomalies observed in this cohort are of severe nature rendering high morbidity burden on the population and require early detection, intervention and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.