Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39634850›Full record

ArticleNanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)2023

Deep reinforcement learning empowers automated inverse design and optimization of photonic crystals for nanoscale laser cavities.

Renjie Li, Ceyao Zhang, Wentao Xie, Yuanhao Gong, Feilong Ding, Hui Dai, Zihan Chen, Feng Yin, Zhaoyu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Inverse design in photonic crystals.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Renjie LiShenzhen Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Lasers, School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8418-4630
Ceyao ZhangFuture Network of Intelligence Institute (FNii), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Wentao XieShenzhen Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Lasers, School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yuanhao GongShenzhen Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Lasers, School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Feilong DingShenzhen Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Lasers, School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Hui DaiShenzhen Research Institute of Big Data (SRIBD), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Zihan ChenSchool of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Feng YinSchool of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Zhaoyu ZhangShenzhen Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Lasers, School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0335-0535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photonics inverse design relies on human experts to search for a design topology that satisfies certain optical specifications with their experience and intuitions, which is relatively labor-intensive, slow, and sub-optimal. Machine learning has emerged as a powerful tool to automate this inverse design process. However, supervised or semi-supervised deep learning is unsuitable for this task due to: (1) a severe shortage of available training data due to the high computational complexity of physics-based simulations along with a lack of open-source datasets and/or the need for a pre-trained neural network model; (2) the issue of one-to-many mapping or non-unique solutions; and (3) the inability to perform optimization of the photonic structure beyond inverse designing. Reinforcement Learning (RL) has the potential to overcome the above three challenges. Here, we propose Learning to Design Optical-Resonators (L2DO) to leverage RL that learns to autonomously inverse design nanophotonic laser cavities without any prior knowledge while retrieving unique design solutions. L2DO incorporates two different algorithms - Deep Q-learning and Proximal Policy Optimization. We evaluate L2DO on two laser cavities: a long photonic crystal (PC) nanobeam and a PC nanobeam with an L3 cavity, both popular structures for semiconductor lasers. Trained for less than 152 hours on limited hardware resources, L2DO has improved state-of-the-art results in the literature by over 2 orders of magnitude and obtained 10 times better performance than a human expert working the same task for over a month. L2DO first learned to meet the required maxima of

Indexed as

deep learninginverse designnanobeamsnanolasersphotonic crystalsreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID39634850
PMCPMC11501320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.