Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39634572›Full record

ArticleCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2024

Utility of an Artificial Intelligence Language Model for Post-Operative Patient Instructions Following Facial Trauma.

Suresh Mohan, Spenser Souza, Shayan Fakurnejad, P Daniel Knott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suresh MohanDivision of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4797-9565
Spenser SouzaDivision of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9147-9691
Shayan FakurnejadDivision of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
P Daniel KnottDivision of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Design: Qualitative Descriptive Study. Objective: To evaluate the utility of post-operative instructions (POIs) for facial trauma provided by the language model ChatGPT as compared to those from electronic medical record (EMR) templates and Google search engine. Methods: POIs for four common facial trauma procedures (mandibular fracture, maxillary fracture, nasal fracture, and facial laceration) were generated by ChatGPT, extracted from EMR templates, or obtained from Google search engine. The POIs were evaluated by a panel of surgeons using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT-P). Results: Average PEMAT-P understandability scores across all 3 sources ranged from 55% to 94%. Actionability scores ranged from 33% to 94%, and procedure-specific scores ranged from 50% to 92%. ChatGPT-generated POIs ranged from 82% to 88% for understandability, 60% to 80% for actionability, and 50% to 75% for procedure-specific items. Conclusions: ChatGPT has great potential to be a useful adjunct in providing post-operative instructions for patients undergoing facial trauma procedures. Detailed and patient-specific prompts are necessary to output tailored instructions that are accurate, understandable, and actionable.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencefacial traumapatient education

Identifiers

PMID39634572
PMCPMC11613249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.