ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
A global analysis of portion size recommendations in food-based dietary guidelines.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Policy to Practice: A Global Analysis to Identify Factors That Influence the Implementation of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines by Health and Nutrition Professionals.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
- Dietary patterns and associated cardiometabolic risk factors among teachers in Makhado Municipality, South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026Article
- Examination of Sustainability Messaging in European Food-Based Dietary Guidelines.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
- Carbon Footprint of Animal- and Plant-Based Protein Foods Consumption Among Adults in Saudi Arabia.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Quantitative comparison of food-based dietary guidelines: alignment with the Slovenian nutrition guidelines 2025 and Slovenian intake.European journal of nutrition · 2026Review
- European food-based dietary guidelines: mapping methodological heterogeneity, sustainability integration gaps and implementation barriers.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Postprandial metabolic effects of milk and yoghurt in young and older adults.Genes & nutrition · 2025Article
- Article
- Determinants of vegetable food choice in families with limited food budgets in England: a focus group study to inform vegetable promotion programmes.Journal of nutritional science · 2025Article
- Proposing a unified Mediterranean diet score to address the current conceptual and methodological challenges in examining adherence to the Mediterranean diet.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Dietary assessment and dietary guidelines across 11 European Union countries: a review from the PLAN'EAT project.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- A comparison of development methods used to define portion sizes in food-based dietary guidelines around the world.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Since large food portion sizes (PS) lead to overconsumption, our objective was to review PS recommendations for commonly consumed food groups reported in Food-Based Dietary Guidelines (FBDGs) globally and to assess variation in PS across countries and regions. Methods: Consumer-oriented FBDGs from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) online repository were used to evaluate dietary recommendations, PS and number of portions for common food groups. Guidelines were classified for each group as qualitative, quantitative, or missing. A standardized approach was applied to convert PS recommendations given as household measures, cup equivalents, pieces and other measures into grams for cross comparison. Variation of recommended PS of common food groups within and across regions was examined. Results: Among 96 FBDGs, variations were found both across and within regions. At a regional level, the highest median PS recommendations were seen in Europe for Meat, Fish and Pulses, in the Near East for Dairy products, and in Africa for most grain-based foods. Recommendations for Fruits and Vegetables showed the highest consistency across FBDGs worldwide, whereas guidance on Meat, fish & eggs and Cooked cereals/grains showed discrepancies in the classification of foods into categories, as well as in the number of portions per day. Discussion: While some variation in PS recommendations across countries can be expected due to cultural and regional dietary practices, inconsistent definitions to refer to a portion and varied derivation methods may further produce discrepancies. Harmonizing development methods for FBDG could help establish more consistent reference portion sizes and therefore provide clearer guidance to consumers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.